NOW:53092:USA01012
http://widgets.journalinteractive.com/cache/JIResponseCacher.ashx?duration=5&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.wp.myweather.net%2FeWxII%2F%3Fdata%3D*USA01012
57°
H 66° L 41°
Clear | 5MPH
  • Print

Mequon asks We Energies to split cost of trail improvements

Feb. 22, 2012 | 4 comments

The Mequon Common Council tabled a proposal to rebuild a segment of the Ozaukee Interurban Trail near the We Energies electric substation south of Bonniwell Road on Tuesday. The total estimated cost of the relocation is $321,048, with 80 percent covered by a Wisconsin Department of Transportation Enhancement Grant and 20 percent coming from the city.

The city has asked We Energies to split that 20 percent cost and will wait for an answer before making a final decision.

Two aldermen, Dan Abendroth and Dale Mayr, appeared opposed to the project, saying it was too expensive.

The Ozaukee Interurban Advisory Council and the Mequon-Thiensville Bike and Pedestrian Committee both have identified the area for upgrades because of safety concerns. Between 175 to 325 people use the trail daily, according to a recent count.

The path crosses directly in front of gates into the substation, which is used by We Energies employees and vehicles two to five times a day. Perhaps a greater concern for those who bike on the path is the steep grade and two reverse curves that make east/south bound riding a challenge. Loose gravel at the bottom of the hill near the gate to the substation can heighten the danger for those on bikes.

Alderman John Hawkins asked how many accident reports there were for the area and was told two. However, since these are bike accidents which do not require reporting, there could be more.

Welcome to our new commenting system.
  • You can now reply to comments. Replies will be threaded to make conversations easier to follow.
  • You can continue to sort comments according to oldest first, newest first, and most thumbs up.
  • Your comments are archived on your own page.
  • Please notify us if you see personal insults or other irresponsible comments. We reserve the right to eliminate any comments and block any commenter who is not civil and respectful of others.

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Limit of 2000 characters, 2000 characters remaining

Sort by
Comment threads per page: 10 | 20 | 50
  1. Isn't this the definition of unnecessary spending? $321,000 to eliminate some grade issues. The tracks are there to stay. Install some more signage, if anything. I use this trail a lot as do others. Familiarize yourself and be careful if you are concerned about safety hazards. I, for one, don't see any issue here. It's inconvenient at worst. This is no high speed trail.
  2. This trail is the definition of bad design. In addition to riding this one, I have ridden many others around the country and in other countries. I love having this here, but it's definitely dangerous.

    The response is typical Mequon: we can't afford it someone else should buy it for us.

    Right, Mequon, wait until someone dies or gets paralyzed, blame the victim for being there, and then applaud yourselves for saving money.
    Hide replies
  3. Presumably the 300k pricetag is put the trail west of the substation which makes the most sense, widening the curves and hill wouldn't be the worst while paving some of the driveway so the fewer stones end up on the trail.

    Although 10k is a drop in the bucket for WE I can't say I agree with asking WE to pay for part of the costs since the substation was there before the biketrail was put in unless it was WE who would only allow the trail to be built in it's current place.
Suburban News Roundup

E-mail Newsletter

Your link to the biggest stories in the suburbs delivered Thursday mornings.


Enter your e-mail address above and click "Sign Up Now!" to begin receiving your e-mail newsletter
Get the Newsletter!

Login or Register to manage all your newsletter preferences.

advertisement

Local Crime Map

CONNECT    

advertisement

Latest Photo Galleries